Report on Undergraduate Forum of Feb. 13, 2006


The CSE Undergraduate Studies Committee (UGSC) organized the annual undergraduate forum on Feb. 13, '06 in DL 266. The forum started at about 6:00 pm and continued till about 8:00 pm, with most students staying on till near the end. The summary below tries to describe the main points that were made during the discussions but it defintely does not capture the enthusiasm of the participants.

A special aspect of this year's forum was the presence of two alums of the department. The two alums are Molly Meeks, a long-ago graduate of the BS-CIS program, currently with the College of Math and Physical Sciences at OSU; and Mary Tanner, a BS-CSE grad (2003), currently with Mettler Toledo. Mary gave a summary of what she sees as the most important skills needed in today's workplace and how students can best prepare for the job market. Molly talked about the services provided the Career Services offices (of both Engineering as well as ASC).


Attendees:
Students:
Alan Delong, CIS sophomore;
Jim Dinan, (grad student and) Open Source Club;
Nima Falahi, CIS junior;
Aaron Fleischer, CSE junior;
Daniel Galron, CIS senior;
Mark Geise, CSE sophomore;
Ray Gerard, CSE junior;
Andy Lathrop, CSE senior;
Alex Lingo, Pre-CIS and Open Source Club;
Carol Mckee, CSE junior and ACM-W;
Anthony Nedolast, CSE senior and NTSig;
Jennifer Rajadhyaksha, CSE sophomore;
Farhad Salehi, CIS senior;
Nicholas Sedden, CSE senior;
Stephen Subleski, ECE (planning to transfer to CSE) senior ;
Brent Warren, CSE junior;
David Weinberg, CSE junior;
Alums:
Molly Meeks, BS-CIS alum;
Mary Tanner, BS-CSE alum (2003);
Faculty: Paolo Bucci, Rajiv Ramnath, Neelam Soundarajan, Al Stutz, Bruce Weide, Xiaodong Zhang (dept. chair).
Advising Office: Peg Steele, Nikki Strader, Shuang Liang.
Staff: Tamera Cramer (Tamera and Peg took care of the pizza and pop; thanks!)

Summary:

  1. Xiaodong Zhang presented his vision for the department and the importance of our undergraduate programs in that vision. He stressed three points:

  2. Changes in CIS and CSE programs: Neelam summarized recent changes in the undergraduate programs:

  3. Changes in courses/new courses: Bruce summarized recent changes in various courses, as well as the introduction of a number of new courses: There was some discussion of possible additional courses. One that was mentioned was a 459 course on Python. Depending on faculty interests and availability, such a course may be developed. It was also noted that a couple of years ago, two undergraduates took the initiative to create and teach (under supervision of a faculty advisor who was ultimately responsible for the course including grades, etc.) a 459 course on C#.

    There was also some discussion of getting undergraduates involved in research. One suggestion was the introduction of a "current topics" course that would explore some possible research problems that might be accessible to undergraduates. This could be an undergraduate version of the current CSE 885 course for graduate students. Alternately, maybe undergraduates might be made aware of the CSE 885 presentations so they can attend any they find interesting. One resource that does provide useful information about this topic is on the SCE web pages: http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~weide/sce/now/projects.html. This page lists links to various research projects that might be of interest to undergrads. Note, in particular, the Europa forum.

  4. Accreditation evaluation of BS-CSE program: Neelam summarized the (preliminary) results of the recent accreditation evaluation of the BS-CSE program. Based on the team's recommendations, the Undergraduate Studies Committee has explored ways of performing additional direct assessments. One important mechanism we have introduced based on these discussions is a brief "exit test" that BS-CSE majors take near their graduation. The test is intended to assess the program and the performance of individual students in the test does not become part of their record; indeed, no information is collected that would allow us to link inidividual students to particular exit test papers. Full details on the exit test as well as the other changes we have made, especially in the capstone courses, are available at: http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~neelam/abet/DIRASSMNT/index.html.

    One other change that is being considered in the BS-CSE program is to revise the statement of program outcomes so that it closely matches the outcomes required by the accreditation criteria. Our current set of outcomes includes the ones required by the criteria but because the terminology used is different, it seems to cause confusion for the accreditation evaluators. Revising the outcomes as proposed will avoid this. But it should be stressed that the philosophy behind the program is not being changed in any way. The question only concerns the official outcomes associated with the program to avoid any potential confusion for the accreditation evaluators. For full details, please see the minutes of the Undergraduate Studies Committee meetings of Jan 24 and 31 at: http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~neelam/ugsc/minutes/0506index.html. Please send any comments to neelam@cse

    There was a question as to why the BS-CIS program was not accredited (by the Computing Accreditation Commission). The answer was that, typically, CS programs in the Colleges of Arts and Sciences in most big universities are not accredited. Programs in the Colleges of Engineering tend to be accredited (because accreditation is an essential requirement for many engineering disciplines such as civil engineering).

  5. Career services, internships, etc.:

  6. Trends in the job market/workplace: Mary Tanner gave a summary of her experiences as a recent CSE graduate who has been working in Mettler Toledo for the last couple of years:

  7. Student organizations: Daniel Galron (who is one of the student reps on the Undergraduate Studies Committee) led a discussion on student organizations. The Open Source Club has been very active during the last couple of quarters; the hope is that this will continue. Similarly, the NTSig group is also very active, and again the hope is that this will continue. ACM-W is also very active. Another student organization that has been reasonably active is the UPE honor society. In all of these cases, specific individual students have been mainly responsible for infusing vigor into the organizations. There was some discussion about how to ensure that the organizations don't become dormant once these particular students graduate. While it would indeed be worthwhile to encourage more junior students to participate so that they can take the lead when the current leaders graduate, ultimately the success of student organizations will depend on the initiative of individual students. But the department should try to build a culture of student activity and involvement.

  8. Student activity and involvement: Some ideas were proposed to help build such a culture:

  9. Some interesting upcoming events: