CSE Exit Survey Response Summary (2007-'12)
Questions Concerning Advising
The CSE Exit Survey consists of three parts. The first part asks the
respondent to assess the importance each of the student outcomes of
the program and the extent to which the outcomes were achieved in the
case of the student completing the survey. The second part asks the
respondent to assess the quality of advising provided to students in
the program. The third part asks about the best features of the
program and for suggestions for possible improvements. The results of
the second part appear below.
For each of four advising-related categories, the respondent was asked
to rank its importance on a scale of "Very Unimportant" through "Very
Important"; and to rank, on a scale of "Very Unsatisfactory" through
"Very Satisfactory", the quality of advising that the respondent
received in each category. In averaging the responses, the following
weights were attached to the various possible responses:
Importance
|
Quality of Advising
|
Response
|
Weight
|
Response
|
Weight
|
Very Unimportant |
0% |
Very Unsatisfactory |
0% |
Somewhat Unimportant |
33% |
Somewhat Unsatisfactory |
33% |
Somewhat Important |
67% |
Somewhat Satisfactory |
67% |
Very Important |
100% |
Very Satisfactory |
100% |
The Results
:
The first column in each table lists the aspect in question, the second shows, as a bargraph, the average importance that respondents for the year attached to that item, the third shows the average value for "quality of advising" that respondents for the year specified for that item; in each case, the numerical percentage represented by the bargraph is also shown. For comparison, a bargraph representing "100%" appears at the top of each column; immediately below that is listed the number of respondents for the year's survey.
Please note that the bar-graphs displaying the results of the various surveys don't display well in some browsers; please check the numerical results printed next to the bar-graphs to be sure of the actual values.
|
Importance
(Very Unmportant -
Very Important)
|
Quality of Advising
(Very Unsatisfactory-
Very Satisfactory)
|
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011 |
N=62
N=79
N=82
N=104
N=121 |
|
|
|
Faculty Advising with respect to course choices
|
|
|
Faculty Advising with respect to graduate school, career options, etc.
|
|
|
Staff Advising with respect to curricular issues
|
|
|
Staff Advising with respect to career options, graduate school, university policies and procedures, referrals, etc.
|
|
|