Presentation Rubrics

TEAM	Name:
	1	2	3	4	Grade
Preparation	Not all team members present and ready to go on time; there were last minute negotiations of who's doing what	There was some last minute confusion about the organization of the presentation	There was some minor disruption because the team wasn't ready when it was their time to go.	All team members were present and ready to go on time; everyone knows who's doing what
Material	Material was note presented at appropriate level of detail; material was not ordered well, seemed haphazard	There were some glaring omissions in the coverage of the project or too much detail was given	Overall coverage was good, but some minor issues could have been covered better	Good coverage at right level; logical transitions; all important aspects were covered in appropriate detail
Mechanics	The team went over their alloted time, team members did not transition well	Close to on time but time inappropriate to topic importance	Some rough transitions, some topics not covered enough or some covered too much	Kept within time limits, smooth transitions, time allotments correspond to importance of topics

INDIVIDUAL Name:
1 2 3 4 Grade
Preparation Material wasn't loaded or didn't play on machine Material not ready - had to search for material Material wasn't pre-loaded onto machine On time & ready to go; presentation material loaded, tested and ready
Material Material was not well-prepared. Coverage of material was not good Some of the material was effective, but there was significant weakness Most of the material was effective but some weak spots Effective presentation material; right level; good coverage of important points;
Oral Delivery Lots of stumbling, spurious sounds, weak voice, didn't seem to know what to say at times Some rough spots. Could project voice better. Some stumbling, a few verbal fillers Projected voice well; no stumbling around or verbal fillers (e.g., ah, um, and-a;); always knew what to say next
Mechanics Not good stage presence, no eye contact, didn't care or know about audience Didn't look at audience, but use of screen was good Not enough eye contact with audience Eye contact; point at screen, not display; face audience; look engaged, stay within time; time allotments correspond to importance of topics

INDIVIDUAL	Name:
	1	2	3	4	Grade
Preparation	Material wasn't loaded or didn't play on machine	Material not ready - had to search for material	Material wasn't pre-loaded onto machine	On time & ready to go; presentation material loaded, tested and ready
Material	Material was not well-prepared. Coverage of material was not good	Some of the material was effective, but there was significant weakness	Most of the material was effective but some weak spots	Effective presentation material; right level; good coverage of important points;
Oral Delivery	Lots of stumbling, spurious sounds, weak voice, didn't seem to know what to say at times	Some rough spots. Could project voice better.	Some stumbling, a few verbal fillers	Projected voice well; no stumbling around or verbal fillers (e.g., ah, um, and-a;); always knew what to say next
Mechanics	Not good stage presence, no eye contact, didn't care or know about audience	Didn't look at audience, but use of screen was good	Not enough eye contact with audience	Eye contact; point at screen, not display; face audience; look engaged, stay within time; time allotments correspond to importance of topics